Author |
Post |
|
#1 Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:46 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
Let's talk about NEPSE.
In NEPSE, even during depression, there was daily trading of around 60crore. Than after commie came, the regular translation fell to 40 crore.
And after biddwan yuraj K came (after new tax, CGT ruling) it is now 20crore. Just 2.5% tax increase and transaction has crashed to half. Its just 2.5% not a biggie says biddwan.
Today, more than half of brokers may not even make 25k profit. With that kind of profit how are they going to run their business. They will suffer, their staff will suffer, their family will suffer, their service will suffer. And hit the economy of thousands of people.
biddwan is alchina to Share market, to Nepal. And 8 class Oli is just 8 class pass, whose death, whole country is waiting for.
I would rather vote for a rapist than a commie.
|
|
#2 Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:25 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
Let me give a lesson on economics to biddwan Yuraj K. I suggest, social media expert, expert patrakar and so called expert to learn a thing or two from following. In civilized society, China lately is in trade war with United States of America. In ongoing trade war, China has imposed 25% tariff on soybean. China used to import from US cause their product must be cheaper. Now, new supplier's product must be expensive. So to counter import price rise, China has reduced tariff on new supplier. Let's say, China needed to reduce tariff of 1% to equal past price. Our biddwan may say, reducing tariff means means low revenue. And low revenue means less money to distribute to commie voters.Now what happens if China had not reduced tariff of 1%. Price from new supplier would have been 1% higher than before. Which means cost of Pork would have increased by 2%. Increase in price of Pork by 2% would have reduced the consumption by 1%. Consumption of 1% decrease would not decrease in production capacity. So, when there is 1% high supply than consumption. Price would have crashed by 5%. And when price crashes by 5%, some farmers/companies would go bankrupt. And hit the economy. Then comes another accident. When some farmers go bankrupt, supply would decrease by 5%, and when there is decrease in supply of 5%, price of pork would increase by 25% which would lead to social unrest. This is what 1% would do in economics. From economic crisis to social unrest. Remember, most of the so called revolution is cause by increase in price of commodity. And our biddwan say, he just increased tax by 1%, 2.5% 50%. Not a biggie! And majority of crowd thinks he is biddwan economist. These things happen in Nepal too. Remember how farmers has to throw their milk, ginger, tomato. How price of vegetable hyper inflates. But since, we dont have good economist who can research, we usually dont get the clear figure. They say there is not enough supply or over supply. But how much over supply or under supply cause it. 1% or 50% ???? There is no system, there is no stability so we would not know, who much cost have increase or decreased.
|
|
#3 Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:10 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
If I were 8 class Oli, I would have collected views, question those would contradict or criticize biddwan Yuraj K. Ask biddwan to clarify why you are right and they are wrong.
If Oli wants to ask question to biddwan, he better do it in live TV since Oli is just 8 class pass so he wont be able to judge the answer of biddwan. So those who watch the TV would respond to biddwan's response.
How is biddwan able to fool all the social media experts and media patrakar expert and so called experts with his anti economics views and theories and believes?
Sati ko sarap????
|
|
#4 Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:03 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
As per Arthur Laffer- "If you tax rich people, if you give that money to the poor people, you will get lots and lots of poor people and no rich people".
8 class Oli and biddwan yuraj K may not understand this phrase. Let me explain, if you tax rich people they will leave the society or stop working. And if you keep on giving poor people, they will never work. So more poor people and no rich people.
|
|
#5 Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:22 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
As per Arthur Laffer- if corporate tax is 35%, company will evade tax, there will be offshore account.
And Nepal's corporate tax is 45%.
He says, good teachers should be paid more than bad teachers. But commie thinks, that would be anti social.
He says - "you cant tax an economy into prosperity". But biddwan yuraj k thinks "tax tax tax".
Ireland which was going through recession, lowered corporate tax to 12.5% and everybody is going to ireland. But in Nepal, biddwan yuraj k increased tax. BFIs' have been paying 45% asked to lower tax 5% which would have equaled to other industry corporate, but what he does, instead of decreasing 5%, he increases 5% of other corporates. He must be thinking, he is brilliant. retard.
|
|
#6 Sat Jun 30, 2018 8:46 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
One woman in Australia quit job and became housewife to take care of children cause of high Income tax.
As per Arthur Laffer- optimal income tax rate is 10-12%.
In Russia, Tax is 12%.
For me, 25% is very high tax, but more than 25% is PAAP.
Tax in Nepal is 36%
Corporate tax in most is 45%.
Sati ko sarap.
these politician and bureaucrats will face karma, cancer to their family. Whose family got cancer- koirala, dahal, madan bhandari, i suspect bhatterai too. Now I want NRB governor and biddwan Yuraj K and Oli too.
|
|
#7 Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:37 pm
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7912
|
He says: you collect X tax if tax is high. And you also collect X Tax if tax is Low.
But collecting X tax with high tax rate will decrease economy and collecting X tax with low tax rate will increase economy which means high income of people and high creation of job and high investment. And out biddwan yuraj k wants to collect X tax with high tax rate cause he is commie a !$!#@$ bag. And our 8 class Oli is too dumb to understand this complexity of system. How long before Oli fires biddwan? When baburam increased revenue, he became hero of social media expert and media. For me he used to be the worst finance minister. Now he is no 2. I would guarantee, biddwan Yuraj K will collect higher tax than last year. I am sure, social media expert and media will make him hero to. But is he really a hero?????? Now, for me Biddean yuraj k has replaced baburam and has become the worst finance minister. Biddwan Yuraj k should send a letter to Arthur Laffer and tell him, he knowledge in economic is flawed 
|
|
#8 Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:48 pm
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2018
Posts: 11
|
I know this is not directly related to stocks but it is a really good lesson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_8LrE8jDb0
|