Forum

माथिल्लो तामाकोसीको सेयर विवाद सुल्झियो

http://setopati.com/bajar/24423/

यसमा मैले उठाउदै गरेको माग पनि सुनुवाई भएछ,

स्थानीयलाई काठमाडौँमै बसेर share भर्ने अवसर l

अब बाँकि आयोजनाले पनि यसै गर्ने छन् र share भर्नका लागि

जिल्लामा जानु पर्ने झन्झट र खर्चबाट मुक्त हुने छन् l

तर अर्को कुरा सबै दोलखालीले ७० कित्ता share पाउने चाही होइन है,

खाली सबैले ७० कित्ताको आबेदन दिने भनेको हो आखिर पहिला

पनि ५० देखि ७० कित्ता भनेकै थियो l

बास्तवमै,

बाठा-टाठा मिलेर कसरी झुक्याउदा रहेछन जनतालाई,

भन्ने कुराको उदाहरण यो तामाकोशीको share प्रकरणले देखाएको छ l

अब बाँकि आयोजना agreement गर्दा बेलैमा बुद्धि पुगोस् l

Dilbert जीले भन्नु भए जस्तै - नेताजीले आफ्नालाई share दिलाउन यो नाटक गरेको जस्तो छ l

I can understand employees of NEA getting some segregated shares but the lenders should not have received any. Those separated for them should be reallocated to the locals and those of EPF depositors. What's next? Employees of the banks who lend hydro companies loan? Cadres of political parties?

The share distributions is not fair at all! The employees of Sanchayakosh will be getting around 3200 kitta/ per employee while the local people will be getting max 70/person. The people who have put their money (Sanchayakarta whose actual fund is being used for the construction of the hydro power) will be getting only about 45 kittas/Sanchayakarta. Now you can imagine how this distribution can be called justifiable at all! Why the employees should be getting so much shares where their stake in this hydro-power is the least?

I don't think the share ratio of the project is fair.

Those who are directly affected and the group whose actual fund is being used get less than 100 share, where as those who have no direct link get more than 1K shares. How is that fair?

The locals and the depositors of the institution that are investing should get lion's share of the segregated shares.

Technically usle wa usko najik ko le na paune bhayo hola ani milayera dinu ni bhaneko hola. Arthat, niyam ali bhagauna 1-2 jana usko manche ko lagi share milai dinu bhaneko hola mero bichar ma.

http://annapurnapost.com/News.aspx/story/7333

यो समाचार पढ्दै गर्दा ,एमाले पोलिटब्युरो सदस्य तथा सभासद् पशुपति चौलागाईंको

यो तलको भनाइ बुझ्न अलि कठिन पर्यो l


" राष्ट्रका लागि विशेष योगदान भएका तर प्राविधिक समस्या भएका व्यक्तित्वका हकमा
आयोजनाले सेयरको सुनिश्चितताका सन्दर्भमा फरक निर्णय गर्नुपर्ने उनको भनाइ थियो। "

फोरमका साथीहरुले प्रष्ट पारिदिनु हुन्छ कि ?