Forum


ShareSansar Main Page

New Topic

Should IPO distribution policy be changed? Let's share our IDEAS?

Moderators: बिमलमान, Dilbert.

Post Reply

Page: 1

Author Post
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 191
राम्रो उपाय के हुन सक्छ भने साना लगानीकर्ता को समूह मा ६० देखि ७० प्रतिसत छुट्टयाउने अनि एक व्यक्ति एक फर्म भन्दा भर्न नपाउने ब्यबस्था कडाई का साथ् लागु गर्ने हो हने ipo मा चलखेल हुन कम हुन्छ किनभने ठुला लगानीकर्ता हरु बाट नै बडी चलखेल भएको देखिन्छ त्येस्करण फर्जी आबेदन रोक्न सक्ने र साना लगानी कर्ता लाइ बादी बड्ने हो भने अहिले भए जस्तो अतिसारो चाही नहोला
सेयर बेच्ने बेलामा नागरिकता हस्ताक्षर र औठाछाप verify नभै बेच्नै नपाउने गराएमा त फर्जी आबेदन त्यसै बन्द होला कि ?
« Last edit by nomoney4630 on Sat Mar 29, 2014 11:52 pm. »
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
Ridi IPO model: both groups under lottery; allotment on April 1

http://sharesansar.com/viewnews.php?id=19590&cat=news

Any View friend. Plz share.

My view, they should have gone for lottery by forming 5 groups.
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
Srikal ji, issue manager lai approach garda ramro hola ki. and dont forget to take your citizenship certificate along with you.

thanks Ajay ji.

any more advice regarding ipo distribution policy? things are getting really tense. for the first time crores issue like ridi has almost got 100 times apply...

if policy maker dont make any move, no one can tell what will happen.
Member
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 2
Mero nam bat arkai le hale6 . Mithila ko .allot pani bha6. Tyo share maile haat parn k garne. Yasta nagarikata batuler share halne haru lai nirutsahit garnu par6.
jay srikal
Member
Registered: Aug 2013
Posts: 840
correct i agree with ajayji
Member
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 2
institutional investors must be separated from public investors..... and public investors should not be separated as small and big........ all should get equal percentage of shares........ big investors are filling up form of all the family members so as as to get maximum number of shares.....
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
Ridi Hydropower's IPO oversubscribed by 92 times

http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=70044
Member
Registered: Jun 2013
Posts: 47
In my view there should be a different category for the banks and other institutional investors and for general public. General public should be alloted shares in just one ratio rather than small and big. Because this will reduce multiple application by one main applicant. Now also there are hundreds of application with the minimum amount. And this is not fare. So just two category general public and institutional. Institutional investors should have a reserved percent of the offered shares like that of Mutual fund.
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2013
Posts: 574
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Khash banne ho bhane yo sabai ko karan hami Nepali haru nai ho. Akhir gau bhari ko manche ko nagarikta bokera aaune hami Nepali haru nai ho ni, hoina ra?
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
One time, we needed to produce original citizenship.
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 8
Ratio milayera dida vaihalthou ni... Milimatto ma hun6 k ho i.e. chalkhel..
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2013
Posts: 574
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
I agree with dukhipurpuro ji. People should be allowed to bring only that of immediate family members. No, "kaka/ mama ko chora/ chori". No, "mitba ko chora ko sathi ko bau" etc. And also original citizenship certificate should be brought.
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 49
ek janaa le yeutaa maatra application tyo pani naagariktaa ko photo milyo milena ruju garera maatra haalna paaune byabasthaa garema ra application maa lyaapche chhap anibarya garne ho bhane maukaa maa chaukaa haana khojne haruko sankhyaa tesai pani kamm hune chha. yetai maanchhe le 30 chaalis janaa ko naagariktaa ko photocopy bokera darkhaasta haalna aaune gareko dekhiya ko chha. Yo ta hadd parakaasthaa bho, hoina ra ? Paribaar maa 5 chha janna jati maatra hunchhan, gaau bhari kaa sojho jantaa ko naagrikataa yeutaile bokne prathaa antya hunu parchha. ani naagriktaa sakkal ko photocopy darkhaasta bujhne kendra le nai photocopy garera raakhne niyam anibaarya garnu parchh, teso bhaya jhukkyaara share ko thupro lagaaune haru taha laagne chhan.
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
congrats dropout ji.
Member
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 80
5 applications 6000 ra each got alloted 2 applications i.e. 20 shares
Lol
Member
Registered: Sep 2013
Posts: 99
Sati Haro
its very simple for the issuing company as well as for the investor.....
make the application process online. & let the investor apply online
once the company gets all the amount it has to issue
immediately close the issue.
by doing this there will be no over subscription & no additional commission burden to the issuing co.
The one who applies will get the allotment result immediately
No need to print the form & distribute the same
in the world of technology we can make use of it....
but as always Nepal will never leave dhada system
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
30 ma aak jana lai na parunu bhane ko ta had ho, Trademark ji.



in the past ipo used to be less risky and less return opportunity. now, with the nagbeli, ipo has become high risky less return opportunity.

for me, it has been a long term investment opportunity.
Member
Registered: Nov 2013
Posts: 18
yeah i too agree this discussion ,
nagbeli ma 30 jana ko naam ma each 10 thousand haleko , ek jana lai pani parena .
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2013
Posts: 574
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
This is what I want;
- Any IPO share that is segregated from general public, i.e. for mutual funds, employees, affected area e.t.c., should have lock in period. In case of mutual fund, or similar, that is going to end before the lock in period expires, should not be allowed to apply for the segregated shares, they should go as regular institutional investors.
- I like the idea put forward by The Rising Sun regarding groups. And also, all three groups should have different way of distributing the allocated shares for each group. I wouldn't mind doing it the old way for the smallest investors, i.e. lottery, but with possibility of higher number of shares.
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
Hope decision makers would study, discuss with others regarding this matter and above ideas and other ideas and do something about it very soon.
Member
Registered: Sep 2013
Posts: 6
I would probably like to see more companies issuing shares at premium, Hopefully we would see more of those in near future.
Member
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 18
Initial Public offering-IPO means there should be involment of only public not of institution,eventhough institutions are also like person but in IPO it is only should be allowed to General people(Mango people).
Member
Registered: Jun 2013
Posts: 193
I agree both you guys, yes especially for Nagbeli Micro finance.
Member
Registered: Jul 2013
Posts: 364
may be local ra general jastai ... public ra institutional investor lai seperate garnu parcha .. or kunai company le kinne vaye secondary ma matrai allow garnu paryo ...
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7914
1: First of all, mutual funds should also be made to que on the line just like all of us.

2: Secondly, instead of two groups (up to 500 and above 500), there should be at least five groups. smaller appliers should get the highest and biggest group of appliers should be allotted the least no of shares, may be 3:1 and others in between.

:'(

Post Reply

Page: 1

Sharesansar Forum Powered By Miracle Hub